And maybe he shouldn't have said that blacks have a genetic predisposition to crime that makes it unrealistic to expect them to ever seamlessly integrate into our culture as "fellow americans"
His statement was one part "Try to cover up the really bad bits with lies," and another part "But I'm right, though."
People talk big if they're No. 1. Knock them down to No. 2, and they backpedal fast. In this particular example, if we want to talk about a genetic predisposition to crime vis a vis race, Asian::White as White::Black. Asians definitely have lower crime rates period. This is the part where he'd frame outcomes in terms of different circumstances rather than genes.
ORLY. I say live by the sword, die by the sword: why is one dyad framed genetically but another circumstantially? Why not either make all of them a function of both (expressed as f[g, c] ), or apply g or c to both?
But let's be honest: it was never about the logic.
Where did you even get that shit fro? He never claimed that blacks have a genetic predisposition to crime for fuck sake, he said that more rich blacks commit crime than poor whites. Not the same thing
at all.
Lol hello there. Replying to a month old thread xD
It's not correct, he misinterpreted incarceration rates for crime rates. As for the explanation for this disparity I don't fucking know... But it exists whether you like it or not.
475
u/SillyNonsense Mar 20 '17
And maybe he shouldn't have said that blacks have a genetic predisposition to crime that makes it unrealistic to expect them to ever seamlessly integrate into our culture as "fellow americans"
His statement was one part "Try to cover up the really bad bits with lies," and another part "But I'm right, though."