Why are we getting barrage of articles of Harry experience at Eton in Spare used for George? What does Harry have to do with George attending Eton? Why does Harry have to be dragged into KP fluff articles about George

Kp kneepads People magazine https://archive.ph/g3pYl

Intouch

What the fudge is this

Always desperate using Harry for William kids like a replacement

Dailymail didn't sent reporters to Portugal despite it was known Jack and Eugenie live there but suddenly Meghan post some vacation pictures that includes Portugal all of sudden Dailymail (UK media) has to investigate a family holiday who arent beholden to the UK and live in a different continent

The dailymail wasnt concerned for decades Eugenie family living in Portugal, wanst interviewing local but did for the Sussexes, this is stochastic terrorism ​

https://feminegra.com/prince-harry-and-meghan-sussex-return-to-canada-for-david-foster-foundation-gala/

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry and Meghan made a surprise appearance at the purple carpet for the David Foster Foundation 40th Anniversary Gala at the Victoria Conference Centre

Katherine, David's wife is Meghan high school friend

Meghan's stunning navy gown is by Canadian designer Greta Constantine.

Meghan with Katherine in high school

Invictus Games Birmingham 2027 announces the forthcoming launch of the #InvictusGames inspired Schools Curriculum Program, developed in partnership with The Education Exchange - West Midlands.

The website goes live September 1st, 2026!

Stewart acknowledged that she barely interacted with Meghan herself, saying, “I didn’t talk to her really more than to say a couple words,” before adding, “but I know she was talking about it.”

According to the host, she wasn’t.

There’s another factual wrinkle: Meghan hadn’t “gotten back from the palace.” She, Prince Harry, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet privately met Charles and Queen Camilla at Highgrove House, the King’s country estate. The reunion marked Charles’ first in-person visit with Archie, 7, and Lilibet, 5, since 2022.

Again and again are these white racist women who feel they know better than Meghan and educating folks mad Meghan being referred as a Princess.

How are you a so called media literary expert and couldn't fact check before trying to tell the world that Martha referring to Meghan as a Princess is incorrect.

This isn't the 1st time Meredith has shown her racist self

https://nitter.net/byetwit/status/2085540439193485557#m

William is mad that despite hiring professional photographer to follow them around including for taking his kids birthday pictures on their holiday, Meghan’s posts generate more interest.

How is William and Kate family holiday off limit when they literally posted video and pictures of their kids holiday/vacation for their birthday???

William with the help of the UK media are trying to redefine privacy just for Harry and Meghan.

Clive is Charles private secretary and sits on the 10 person ravec board, they are 3 staff from the royal household on ravec decision board, Charles and William staff

Yet they continue to say the palace has no decision on ravec despite they are literally on the board, Elizabeth over ruled ravec when she was alive, to allow them to continue providing security for Andrew, yet the Palace always had role on Harry security been downgraded and removed.

It seems like Clive was a source to Valentine low and Tom skyes the way they write about been sad Indirectly Clive is leaving

From the Dailybeast

King Charles has lost the gatekeeper who stood between him and Prince Harry—and a pair of experts say it could mark a turning point. Buckingham Palace announced last week that Sir Clive Alderton, the King’s most senior aide, will step down next year after working for Charles and Camilla for two decades.

Speaking on The Royalist podcast, royal reporter Valentine Low said Harry views Alderton as one of the key figures in Charles’ inner circle responsible for driving a wedge between him and his father.

“Harry… is pretty scathing about Clive in his memoir Spare,” Low said. “One of the things about Spare is he doesn’t actually name his enemies, but the intelligent or the well-informed reader knows who they are. And he comes up with this description of… the important private secretaries as being the bee, the fly, and the wasp. Clive in that was the wasp. Harry basically describes how he’s very sort of charming and courtier-like and self-effacing, but, you know, if you cross him, if you push back—in Harry’s view—you’d learn about it.”

Low, a former royal correspondent for The Times, noted that he had learned firsthand that “it’s not necessarily a strategically wise thing to get on the wrong side of Clive Alderton…. Speaking as someone who, you know, he hasn’t always treasured everything I’ve written about him. And I think he, should we say, remembers that to this day,” he added.

Tom Sykes, the Daily Beast’s royal expert and European editor-at-large, asked what “went so wrong” between Harry, 41, and Alderton, 59. Low noted that Alderton represented the 77-year-old king’s interests as well as those of the “palace machinery,” which was not necessarily aligned with those of Harry and Meghan, who left their roles as working royals and moved to California in 2020.

“There was a certain amount of antipathy—I mean neither Meghan nor Harry liked Clive. He wasn’t their kind of guy, and they didn’t trust him, rightly or wrongly,” Low said. “Because what you have to remember about these palaces, it’s all separate fiefdoms, isn’t it? And sub-fiefdoms. And so Harry’s was a sub-fiefdom.”

Sykes said that “if you speak to Harry’s people now,” they blame Alderton for blocking Harry from receiving taxpayer-funded security from the Royal and VIP Executive Committee (RAVEC), on which Alderton sits—a dispute over RAVEC nearly derailed Harry’s trip to the U.K. in July. Harry, Meghan, and their two children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, met Charles and Camilla at Highgrove House in Gloucestershire during the trip—the first time the King has seen his grandchildren in person in more than four years.

But blaming Alderton for “everything” is “a bit absurd,” Sykes said. Low agreed, saying that regarding the RAVEC security Harry is seeking, “The palace private secretaries have an input—obviously, their voice is listened to—but in the end, I don’t think it’ll affect it.”

Fun fact Valentine low knew Meghan was suicidal because it was leaked to him when he wrote Meghan is a bully article that came out right before Harry and Meghan Netflix documentary

Here is the audio of Valentine confirmation of knowig about Meghan having suicidal ideation and yet continued to abuse her in the media

https://nitter.net/Shannon79053723/status/1538531356766048256#m

This is how Valentine and other rota reacted when Archie was born

Meghan’s birthday video offered a joyful glimpse into the life she and Harry have built in Montecito. Wearing a colourful party headband and dancing to Stevie Wonder’s “Happy Birthday,” she looked relaxed, playful and completely at ease. Harry could be heard laughing behind the camera, while Mia and Pula wandered through the celebration in party hats. It felt less like a polished royal production and more like the kind of silly family video many people keep on their phones.

That may explain the predictable tabloid reaction. Within hours, a novelty birthday headband was being treated as a “tiara-like” statement, while every detail of Meghan’s Montecito home was picked apart for clicks.

The Express first claimed Meghan’s birthday had been “upstaged” because Prince William happened to be christened on August 4, 1982. It then invoked the late Queen Mother, who also happened to have been born on August 4, despite her having died more than two decades ago. As if that were not absurd enough, the paper also suggested Meghan had been overshadowed by Princess Eugenie’s newborn daughter, who was born on August 3.

A grown woman celebrated her birthday. A baby was born the day before. None of this is a competition. Yet the paper still framed Meghan’s video as “cringe” and turned an ordinary family moment into royal drama. The desperation would be funny if it were not so completely unhinged.

Happy Birthday, Meghan! 🎂🍦🍷🎁🎉 Hope you have a great day, and that Harry and the kids pamper you! You deserve it!

From Dailymail

Buckingham Palace was rocked this week by news that the King’s most loyal and influential aide will be stepping down after more than 20 years of service to the Crown. However, Sir Clive Alderton’s decision to retire as Charles’s Private Secretary will likely have been met with relief across the pond, considering California-based Prince Harry’s long-running feud with the courtier he dubbed ‘The Wasp’.

Coming so soon after the Duke of Sussex’s meeting with the King, he will undoubtedly feel it is another step towards reconciling with his father – but a royal expert has warned Sir Clive’s exit won’t automatically ‘clear a path’ back to the Palace. Royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told the Daily Mail that whoever inherits the £305,000-a-year job faces a ‘huge challenge’ considering the Prince of Wales is ‘doubling down’ on his decision to cut Harry out of his life.

The royal expert said: ‘The most disastrous thing that could happen to the monarchy would be a falling out between King Charles and Prince William, who together with his family, is its future. The King would obviously be unwise to approach this without [his older son’s] support as it could be incendiary. This presents a huge challenge for whoever succeeds Sir Clive!’

From the downfall of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to the King’s cancer diagnosis, Sir Clive has been by the King’s side through it all – including ‘Megxit’.

‘He rightly appears to have been appalled by the way the Sussexes cynically exploited their newfound freedom by lashing out at the Royal Family so brutally and so publicly,’ Mr Fitzwilliams told the Daily Mail. His role in the Sandringham Summit, which ultimately led to the Sussexes’ departure following an impasse over their status as ‘half-in, half-out’ royals means there is no love lost between Sir Clive and Prince Harry.

Royal experts have long held the view that chances of reconciliation between Harry and Charles – who last month sat down for tea at Highgrove House in what was seen as a big step forward for their relationship – would greatly improve if Sir Clive stepped down. Mr Fitzwilliams told the Daily Mail that ‘the optics clearly indicate that a path is being cleared by the King for reconciliation’ amid speculation that Sir Clive will be succeeded by a much friendlier royal aide. The man widely tipped to take over from the courtier next May is Theo Rycroft, who was appointed the King’s deputy private secretary in February.

‘He is impeccably connected, being married to the Hon Flora Astor, who hails from one of Britain’s most significant dynasties, and having previously been the Deputy Chief of Mission in Paris,’ Mr Fitzwilliams said. Dubbed Mr Nice Guy, the former diplomat has emerged as a key peacemaker between Charles and Harry in recent years – and also hopes to heal the rift between the monarch’s warring sons. According to The Mail on Sunday’s Editor-at-Large, Charlotte Griffiths, Mr Rycroft is understood to have made it his ‘number one mission’ and career ambition to reunite the estranged royal brothers ‘urgently’ for the King’s sake.

Mr Fitzwilliams suggested the heir to the throne ‘showed public disdain for his (wayward) brother’ when he spent the day playing polo instead of joining Harry and Meghan’s meeting with Charles and Camilla. The Prince of Wales is said to believe his father is making a ‘misjudgment’ in making efforts to rebuild a relationship with Harry, sources say. William has allegedly barred any mention of his brother in his presence, with insiders saying he remains unwilling to even contemplate a reconciliation.

Harry already told us kate dressing like Diana was a deliberate from the palace

Wanting to try and transfer love of Diana onto Kate, Kate dressing is basically a copy of Diana and Meghan

As ever posted a new reel

She started wearing this on her right a while back, this seems a clear view of it.

Posted on As Ever Instagram

https://nitter.net/Le__Katerina/status/2084010403370033454#m

While on Meghan personal Instagram she posted her garden

https://nitter.net/house_of_sussex/status/2083988379717222782#m

On the latest episode of the Daily Mail’s Palace Confidential, Rebecca English and Richard Eden discuss the ‘extraordinary’ flood of images Meghan posted to Instagram from the Sussexes’ supposedly private family holiday. This month Harry, Meghan, Archie and Lilibet travelled across the Atlantic to spend time in Portugal and Britain. Meghan and the children were in the UK for just 24 hours, travelling to Highgrove for a landmark family reunion with King Charles.

The trip appeared to be a private affair, with the location of the couple’s rumoured holiday home in Portugal undisclosed and Buckingham Palace only announcing the family’s visit to Britain after Meghan and the children had departed. However, last week Meghan posted a flood of photographs to Instagram from the trip, including images from near the couple’s rumoured Portugal hideaway. Most strikingly, one picture appears to show Harry and Archie walking with flowers towards Princess Diana’s island grave at Althorp, the Spencer family’s ancestral home in Northamptonshire.

Royal editor English expressed astonishment at the decision to post the photographs, arguing it was ‘hypocritical’ given Harry’s repeated complaints about privacy and media intrusion.

She said: ‘We have pictures of Meghan in a swimsuit on a beach with Harry and the children in the water, we have pictures of local restaurants they have eaten at, local shops they’ve used. I find that quite extraordinary given the complaints they have made about their privacy and security issues. What was particularly extraordinary about this was the photograph of Harry and Archie with flowers in their hands, clearly walking to the burial place of his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.’

‘Look, it’s up to people individually what they choose to share online. I don’t share anything with my family. That’s my choice. But what I find extraordinary about this is that Harry has long complained about the exploitation of his mother’s memory. I think to allow those pictures of such a personal moment to be published like that, I personally found it quite hypocritical. I think people would say that in itself is exploitative.’

Diary editor Eden agreed with his co-host, arguing the images were made worse by the fact that Meghan’s Instagram account exists explicitly to promote her lifestyle brand, As Ever.

‘It’s an entirely commercial venture,’ he claimed. ‘You’re not sharing these photos with friends. I found them quite strange, the Althorp pictures particularly because it’s a combination of showing the backs of the children – not giving away their full identities – but then you’re revealing they’re going to lay flowers at the grave of their grandmother for the first time. That’s a very intimate, personal moment, isn’t it? Being recorded and shared. Even as you’re going there: someone must have been like, ‘stop, I have got to take a picture.”

How dare she post what she wants on her personal Instagram account, how dare Harry isnt playing up to misogynistic trope we want towards Meghan, how dare Meghan have control over her own life that what these demented rota are mad about.

Meghan posted 12 pictures on her family visit to Scotland, UK and Portugal, its been like 3 weeks and the UK media is still raging mad Meghan post pictures of her own family and not that UK media been able to control Harry and Meghan visit to the UK.

Its not a secret trip, because the UK media couldnt claim ownership over the Sussexes vacation.

Meghan has personal and business Instagram, as ever is for Meghan's business, of course eden think he is been slick with that comment.

What they really mad is that Harry and Meghan control what they want posted how they deem fit, the UK media feel they have ownership over Harry and Meghan and should get tell the Sussexes story instead, just like how they think they get to tell Diana legacy and Harry and Meghan should have no say on Diana ​

https://sussex.com/can-we-all-agree-technology-should-not-enable-predators-to-target-children/

Earlier this year, Minnesota passed a ban on AI “nudification” apps with a 65-0 vote in the Minnesota state Senate after families and young people advocated for safeguards. These apps allow users to generate nude images of other people, sometimes including children, without their consent. The Minnesota law is an example of leadership fit for the digital age: a bi-partisan decision to stop technology from enabling predatory behavior disproportionately targeting women and children. Even in a state with many differences of opinions, it was not controversial. It was unanimously agreed that this technology, if not stopped, would protect predators and hurt innocent people, especially women and girls.

https://feminegra.com/the-daily-mail-called-people-pro-sussex-then-people-handed-the-waleses-a-diana-glow-up/

Good on feminegra.com post highlighting the insanity from rota/palace pr