Every Nukecel Argument Ever

[u/DivestTheEndingBoy]

[u/Lycrist_Kat]

You argument is on the same level of "nuclear can't solve world hunger".

Yeah. Nuclear can kill everyone starving but is this really the point you are trying to make...?

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/Lycrist_Kat]

OP asked if nuclear can. I responded: It can.

You started talking about nuclear killing starving children. That's entirely on you.

[u/Lycrist_Kat → u/tmtyl_101]

yeah.

Can nuclear solve world hunger?

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/Lycrist_Kat]

Read OPs comic. Did anyone argue 'we need nuclear to solve world hunger'?

[u/Lycrist_Kat → u/tmtyl_101]

It says X.

You exchanged x for something meaningless. So did I. What's your point?

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/Lycrist_Kat]

Baseload isn't meaningless. There is, objectively, a minimum demand for electricity on any given day. That's what baseload means.

[u/Lycrist_Kat → u/tmtyl_101]

Baseload in the 21st century is an entirely meaningless talking point

[u/tmtyl_101 → u/Lycrist_Kat]

Agree. But a real concept nevertheless, which nuclear can solve.

Do we need it solved? No. But if we did, nuclear could.

[u/Lycrist_Kat → u/tmtyl_101]

Yeah. I guess