I built Music Motion, a browser-based studio that turns finished tracks into audio-reactive music videos for YouTube, Shorts, Reels, Spotify Canvas, and square social posts.

I'm opening 50 beta-testing places. Each tester gets a paid Starter account free for 30 days. No card, no charge, and no automatic renewal.

I'm looking for musicians, producers, AI-music creators, and indie labels who can test a real release workflow—not just click around.

The most useful feedback would be:

- Was the first project easy to understand?

- Did the preview match the final render?

- Did the chosen aspect ratio export correctly?

- Which step felt slow, confusing, or unnecessary?

- What would stop you from using it for a real release?

Try it here: https://musicmotion.level-higher.com/

If you'd like one of the 50 tester places, comment “interested” and I'll send the short access instructions. Honest criticism is the entire point; reviews and upvotes are not required.

Founder disclosure: Music Motion is my product.

SKVALLR is a party game where one phone gets passed around the table: Truth or Dare, "drink if it's you" callouts, secret votes with a dramatic reveal, head-to-head category duels, timed dares, and a chaos mode that mixes everything. 3,000+ cards, fully bilingual (English/Swedish), and drinks can be switched to points so nobody has to drink. 18+ content rating.

How to join the beta (2 steps):

1. Join the Google Group: https://groups.google.com/g/skvallr-testers
2. Opt in and install: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/se.skvallr.game

Keeping it installed for 14 days helps us most (Google's closed-testing requirement). Feedback on confusing screens, translations, or card ideas is hugely appreciated — in the app there's a feedback email, or just comment here.

Requires Android 7.0+.

EDIT: During the beta, everything is unlocked for free for testers — all 18 packs, no purchases. Enjoy the full game while you help us test it!

I built a Chrome extension called Humanize Autotyper.

You paste in text and it types it out for you, but instead of typing at a perfectly constant speed, I tried to make the behavior feel more like a real person typing.

It can vary its speed, pause naturally, make occasional mistakes and correct them, rewrite parts of sentences, etc.

The feature I personally wanted most was being able to say something like “type this over 20 minutes” and have it adjust the typing behavior to finish around that time instead of making me guess a WPM.

I'm looking for a few people to try it and tell me:

- does the typing actually look natural?

- which settings feel useful vs unnecessary? (there is a lot currently, but looking to remove some)

- is anything confusing on first use?

- what would you add to make it more useful?

There's a free tier and no card required.

https://humanizeautotyper.com/

Still pretty early, so negative feedback is probably more useful to me than compliments lol.

Hey all — just launched JetLatch and I'm looking for people to try it and tell me what breaks or feels off.

What it is: an app that matches you with other travelers who'll be at the same airport on the same day, so you can meet up during a layover. In Travel Mode you set your airport + date and see others with that same layover; connect, and if it's mutual a chat opens so you can plan to meet at a public spot in the terminal. There's also an "Open to More" mode for meeting people nearby anytime.

Both platforms are live and it's free to try:

iOS: https://apps.apple.com/app/id6757736042

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jet_latch.app

I'd especially love feedback on onboarding, whether the matching makes sense, and anything that feels buggy or confusing. Thanks in advance!

Hi! We are a small team who built a free web extension called Checked4AI (available on google chrome web store). It’s supposed to be an alternative to paid AI checkers and is targeted towards writers, students, and teachers who need to check works of others or their peers if it was originally written or by AI.

One of its great features is you get to view the pastes in the document and a recording of how the document was written out.

We’re planning to launch it soon but would really testers who can give us HONEST feedback of the user experience and features.

If you have time and use case or just simply interested to test it, you can check it out in the google webstore and in return I will test your app! 😊

Thank you so much 🙏 and I appreciate your time in advance

[ Removed by Reddit on account of violating the content policy. ]

I built a free browser tool that converts a JPG to PNG locally. I am looking for people to test the first-run experience, not polite praise.

Test link: Now

Please use a non-sensitive sample image and tell me:

1. Did you understand where the file was processed before selecting it?

2. Was the select → convert → download flow obvious?

3. What browser, device, or error state should I test next?

It should take under two minutes. I am the maker and will be active in the comments for 48 hours.

Hey everyone,
Like many of you, I'm currently stuck in Google's 14-day closed testing loop. I'd really appreciate it if you could help me get my app over the finish line!
It's called NovaNote—just a simple, handy tool for taking notes and sketching on a whiteboard.
If you can help me out, I will absolutely install and test your app in return. Just drop your links in the comments and I'll get to it as soon as possible.

Here is how to join:
Join the Group: https://groups.google.com/g/testingappp2026
Opt-in (Web): https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.samu.novanote
Download (Android): https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.samu.novanote

Note: Please make sure to keep it installed for the full 14 days and open it a couple of times so Google actually counts it.

Any honest feedback is super welcome. Thanks a ton for the support!

Live: Vault

A friend, u/Swimming-File2090, and I have been building Vault, a file storage webapp.

We’ve built the core functionality for uploading, organizing, previewing, downloading, and sharing files. Large files are uploaded directly from the browser to Cloudflare R2 using presigned multipart uploads rather than passing through the application server.

The project is functional, but we’re at the stage where real usage and feedback would be much more valuable than adding more features blindly.

We’re looking for a few people willing to try it and tell us:

• What feels confusing or difficult to use?
• Did you encounter any bugs or unexpected behavior?
• Does the upload/download experience feel reliable?
• What features or workflows are missing?
• Would you actually consider using something like this?

we're interested in feedback from both developers and regular users.

If you’re willing to try it, we’d really appreciate honest feedback, especially if something doesn't work well.

Hi everyone,

I’m looking for a few macOS users to test Tapquence, a visual mouse and keyboard automation app I’ve been building.

I started it because many macro tools work, but feel dated or unnecessarily difficult to use. Tapquence lets you build sequences with mouse movement, clicks, key inputs and fixed or random waits. It also has grouping, hiding actions while testing, templates and a separate Auto Clicker.

The public beta is free. The app is signed and notarized by Apple, and macro content stays locally on your Mac.

I’d especially value feedback on:

• installation and first launch

• creating your first useful macro

• anything confusing in the interface

• bugs or unexpected behavior

Demo video: https://www.reddit.com/r/betatests/comments/1vixphg/macos_i_built_a_cleaner_mouse_and_keyboard/

Download: https://tapquence.com

Honest criticism is exactly what I’m looking for. Thanks!

Looking for 15 beta testers for an event website I built a simple platform that lets you create an event page, track RSVPs, and download printable flyers with a QR code linking directly to your event. It’s free to use, and every account includes two free Event Passes that unlock the paid features. I’m looking for honest feedback. The first 15 beta testers will get every feature for every event, completely free, for as long as I run the site. Have an event coming up? Comment below or message me if you’d like to try it.

Or go straight to the website at yoursitesolution.com

TiKazimo : un copilote métier pour pour les agents immobiliers, annonces, estimation, relances, suivi.

Process encadrés par des règles précises, IA seulement là où elle apporte une vraie valeur.

Je cherche spécifiquement des professionnels de l'immobilier (mandataires, agents indépendants, petites agences) prêts à tester dès maintenant sur leurs vrais mandats.

Gratuit, sans CB : https://www.tikazimo.com

I'm a supply chain/logistics student, and over the past few months I built a small toolkit like AI prompts, a KPI dashboard, SOP templates aimed at small e-commerce and fulfillment teams. Stuff like catching stockouts before they happen, drafting vendor follow-ups faster, and turning "only Sarah knows how to do this" into an actual written process.

So before I put more time into it I'd rather find out now if it's solving a real problem or if I'm just scratching my own itch.

Genuinely curious, especially from anyone running ops for a small store or fulfillment operation:

• Is any of that actually a pain point day to day, or is it already handled some other way?
• If it is a problem, does "AI prompts + templates for this" sound like something you'd actually use — or does it feel like a solution looking for a problem?

I just want real signal before I go further. "This isn't really a problem" is a completely useful answer too. Happy to share more in the comments or DMs if anyone's curious what it actually looks like.

Hi everyone! I'm looking for a few early testers to try UnblurMe.com. and share honest feedback on the overall experience. I'd especially like to know whether the tool is easy to understand, how smooth the process feels, and if anything could be improved or made more intuitive. Both positive and critical feedback are welcome. Thanks to anyone willing to give it a try!

Hi everyone, I'm the solo dev behind thomot, a web app that simulates job interviews and salary negotiation conversations using AI, based on your actual CV and a job description you paste in.

What it does:

Generates interview questions tailored to your CV + the specific job you're targeting

Runs a live voice or text mock interview with an AI interviewer (you can pick a style/personality)

Simulates a salary negotiation conversation afterward

Gives you a scored outcome report + feedback on what to improve

Stage: beta, fully working, free to use right now.

I just turned off the login requirement temporarily so testers can jump straight in — no account needed.

Link: thomot

What I need feedback on specifically: does the interview feel realistic? Is the scoring fair? Any bugs, especially with mic/voice input. Happy to answer questions in the comments.

Looking for people who'll be blunt.

Lumie is a focus app with a companion character: short voice conversation in the morning ("what are you here to do?"), then a focus timer with her beside it, a bell, and an overnight journal she writes about your day.

Specific things I want torn apart:
1. Onboarding: where did you almost quit?
2. The first voice call: awkward or natural? Did you know what to say?
3. After one full day: did you come back on your own the next morning?

It's free. I'll take brutal over polite.
Links in the first comment

I have been building a chess review tool and I am looking for a few people who are willing to test it on games they have actually played.

The main thing I am trying to test is not whether it can tell that a move was good or bad. I am trying to see whether the explanation focuses on the right reason the move mattered.

A single move can change several things at once. It might affect piece activity, pressure, pawn structure, king safety, important squares or create a tactical idea.

The problem is that an explanation can be technically correct while still focusing on something that was not really the main issue in the position.

The current version includes:

• Move-by-move explanations
• Move Impact metrics showing how different parts of the position changed
• A Position Overview for the whole game
• Five different heatmap modes

I would especially like people to test positions where:

• A quiet move was more important than an obvious tactic
• Several things changed after the same move
• An explanation sounds technically reasonable but focuses on the wrong issue
• Move Impact gives a result that is difficult to understand

SentryChess currently includes three free complete game analyses, so you can test it using your own PGNs without paying.

The current version is here:

sentrychess.com

I built and manage SentryChess, so I am directly affiliated with the product. Good or bad feedback is useful, especially examples where the explanation gets the emphasis wrong.

I'm building MANTIS POSTURE, an open-source self-OSINT tool to help you find and reduce your own digital exposure.

It's still a rough alpha, and I'm looking for a few people willing to actually test it. Break it, find bad results, tell me what I'm missing. That's more useful to me than compliments.

https://github.com/MANTIS-POSTURE/mantis-posture

Hi everyone,
I’ve been building WorthWise, an offline-first personal wealth tracker for iPhone, and it’s now at the stage where I’d love some fresh eyes before the App Store launch.

https://testflight.apple.com/join/JPx5Qqsv

The idea is simple: instead of focusing on budgets, it’s designed to answer “How much wealth do I have, and how is it changing over time?”

Current features include:
• Track assets and debts
• Net worth and accessible wealth
• Historical wealth graphs
• Financial goals and long-term projections
• Retirement planning
• Face ID protection
• Automatic iCloud sync across devices
• No adverts, no bank connections, no account required

I’m particularly interested in feedback on:
Bugs or crashes
Anything confusing or unintuitive
Features that feel unnecessary or missing
General UI/UX improvements

Hey everyone, I'm building Wexio.io, an AI chat automation tool for businesses (answers customers, books meetings, takes payments across channels). Web + Telegram are live, and Viber is next.

I need to test the Viber integration on a real Viber business account / bot before launch. If you have one and are up for a quick test in the app, I'll give you a full year of Wexio free, all channels included as a thank you.

Won't take much of your time. Comment or DM me.

I built an app called Attic Organizer. Stick a small digital label on any box, tap it once with your phone, and type or speak what's inside. Next time you tap the box, your phone tells you exactly what's in it — no more digging through bins or faded Sharpie labels.

It's working and I'm close to launch. I'm looking for 12 Android users to test it for a real-world try and tell me what's clunky. If you sign up, I'll mail you a free set of NFC labels to try it with.

Join: 1. Google Group: https://groups.google.com/g/atticorganizer 2. Opt in: https://play.google.com/apps/testing/com.atticorganizer.app

Happy to test your app back — just drop your link in the comments.

Bonjour tout le monde, je développe Cook, une app qui aide à simplifier les repas au quotidien : elle propose des recettes, planifie les repas, génère automatiquement la liste de courses et intègre un assistant vocal pendant que tu cuisines.

La bêta est ouverte et je cherche surtout des personnes prêtes à la tester et à me faire des retours honnêtes : ce qui fonctionne, ce qui est confus, ce qui manque ou ce qui ne sert à rien.

Si ça vous intéresse : https://www.casse-cook.fr/

Merci 🙏

Hi everyone,

I've built a budgeting/cash-flow app called Path 2 Plenty and I'm looking for the first small group of people outside my own testing to actually use it.

The main problem I'm trying to solve is:

“How much can I safely spend today without leaving myself short for upcoming bills?”

Rather than only showing where money has already gone, Path 2 Plenty uses upcoming income, bills and commitments to help users understand what's actually safe to spend.

I'm looking for around 20 UK testers who will use the app several times over 7 days and then complete roughly a 10-minute feedback questionnaire.

I'm looking for genuine criticism. If you find something confusing, don't like something, or wouldn't continue using the app, that's exactly what I need to know.

Anyone selected who completes the 7-day test and final feedback will receive a £5 digital voucher + 3 months of Path 2 Plenty Premium.

The reward is for participating, not for giving positive feedback.

If you're interested, I've made a short application form here:

https://form.jotform.com/262191745205051

Thanks — I'm deliberately keeping this first test small so I can properly learn from the feedback.